
“Have you noticed … there is never any third act in a nightmare? They bring you to a climax of terror and then leave you there. They are the work of poor dramatists.” — Max Beerbohm

“Have you noticed … there is never any third act in a nightmare? They bring you to a climax of terror and then leave you there. They are the work of poor dramatists.” — Max Beerbohm

In 1078, Saint Anselm of Canterbury presented a proof that God exists. We define God as a being than which no greater can be conceived. If God existed only in the mind, then we could conceive of a greater God, one who exists in both mind and reality. Therefore God cannot be merely imaginary — he must exist in reality.
Australian philosopher Douglas Gasking offered this response. The creation of the world is the worthiest achievement imaginable. Its merit is the product of its intrinsic quality and the ability of its creator. The greater the creator’s handicap, the more impressive the achievement. The most grievous handicap would be non-existence. An existent creator would be subordinate to one that does not exist. Therefore, if God is the greatest conceivable being, then he does not exist.
(William Grey, “Gasking’s Proof,” Analysis 60:4 [October 2000], 368-370.)
Artist Jeff Lieberman designs “Impossible Corners,” a wall art illusion that exploits the same principle as this mistrustful dragon.
A code of principles proposed at the 1889 National Hobo Convention:
The convention was held by Tourist Union #63, a union of hobos created in the mid-1800s. Members sought to resist anti-vagrancy laws by representing themselves as itinerant workers rather than idle miscreants.

In 2023, the artist collective SFHIR created this nine-story mural in Fene, Galicia, for the first Perla Mural Fest. At night the instrument comes to life as the building’s stairwell is illuminated.
The mural was judged best among 50 finalists in the Street Art Cities 2023 awards.
“To be sure, the dog is loyal. But why, on that account, should we take him as an example? He is loyal to men, not to other dogs.” — Karl Kraus

A visual proof that the sum of all positive odd numbers up to 2n – 1 is a perfect square.
locodescriptive
adj. describing a particular place or places
hippocrepiform
adj. shaped like a horseshoe
elsewhither
adv. in a different direction
mirific
adj. working wonders; wonderful
The Rochester Institute of Technology contains a portal to another dimension. In 2013, student Michael Lacanilao deliberately set out to create a record of an “Escherian stairwell” on campus that forms a perpetual downward loop.
Lacanilao has long since graduated, but the stairwell is still commemorated on the school’s website.
(Thanks, Colin.)
On the morning of Aug. 6, 1945, a customer was sitting on the steps of Sumitomo Bank in Hiroshima, waiting for the branch to open, when an atomic bomb exploded over the city. The bank was only 260 meters from ground zero, and as the intense heat burned its stone face white, the customer’s body shielded one section of the steps, leaving a “shadow” in that place.
The steps are now preserved in the Hiroshima Peace Memorial Museum.
In 1946, the British mission to Hiroshima and Nagasaki noted that the surfaces of asphalt roads “retained the ‘shadows’ of those who had walked there at the instant of the explosion.” It called them “objects of macabre interest and pilgrimage for visitors.”

Hansel and Gretl have discovered a gingerbread cottage and are wondering whether to eat some of the tiles on its walls. A witch appears and tells them how they must go about it. “Each of you is to name a whole number between 0 and 100. Hansel’s must be odd and Gretl’s even. No conferring. Whoever chooses the lower number can eat twice that number of gingerbread tiles. Whoever chooses the higher number can eat the lower number.” So, for example, if Hansel chooses 57 and Gretl chooses 30, Hansel will get 30 tiles and Gretl will get 60.
This sounds fine, but the children have just had lessons in game theory and regard this as a non-cooperative game between rational utility maximizers. Gretl knows that Hansel will not choose 99, because 97 would leave him better off if she chose 98 and no worse off if she chose any other number. By the same reasoning, she will avoid 98 and choose 96. In her mind she can follow this train all the way to its end: Rationally, it seems, she must choose 2. Hansel, following it also, finds himself indifferent between 3 and 1. In the end he will receive a paltry two tiles and Gretl either one or four.
Is all of this sound? Gretl says, “There is something radically peculiar about trains of thought which proceed in the subjunctive. You are to work out what you would be rational to do, if I were to choose a number which I shall not choose. I am to do likewise, with each train of thought reproduced inside the other. What happens if either player derails a train by choosing in defiance of it? In that case it becomes radically unclear whether either player still has a rational choice.”
(Martin Hollis, “The Gingerbread Game,” Analysis 54:4 [October 1994], 196-200.)